Monday, July 31, 2017

Notations On Our World : A Snapshot of July Courtesy of the Financial Times of London

As we bid farewell to July, please enjoy a snapshot of our World courtesy of the Financial Times of London:

 

FT round-up July

This month's top reads

Brexit and the prospect of national humiliation

Things are going badly wrong in Brexit-land and Britain appears to face a choice between three different types of humiliation, writes Gideon Rachman. Here he lists what he sees as the three uncomfortable outcomes the UK faces as it negotiates leaving the EU.
Read now

FT Columnist

1FT readers, I will miss you most of all
2How I lost my 25-year battle against corporate claptrap
3Lucinda Chambers and the art of being sacked
Read Lucy

Illustration of the month

Ingrim Pinn's ‘Summer holiday’

Theresa May goes in search of a break in the Alps
See more Ingrim Pinn illustrations

Number of the month

€3bn

The amount Greece raised from its first bond sale for three years.
Find out more
Everything Else glasses

Everything Else podcast

We're into film not finance, music not markets, and style not stocks. Everything Else is a culture podcast from the Financial Times, featuring star guests and presented by Griselda Murray Brown.
You can listen on FT.com or using iTunesStitcherAcastSpotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
playListen now

 

Sunday, July 30, 2017

View of the Week (W-End Edition): On Linear Thinking (From our Archives)

As our team continues its' on-going strategic assessment, we revisited one from our archives on Linear Thinking as we continue to assess what is at hand for the broad road map ahead that we hope all take note of courtesy of the noted futurologist and thinker Peter Diamandis:


Our brains are literally hardwired to think locally and linearly.
As such, it’s nearly impossible for us to fathom the implications of exponential change.
Exponential technologies are a tsunami of change... and you can either surf on top of them or be crushed by them.
Kodak was crushed.
Check out this 5 minute video that illustrates the implication of ignoring disruptive technologies.
Thumb 1.jpg

The New “Kodak Moment”

In 1996, Kodak was at the top of its game, with a market cap of over $28 billion and 140,000 employees.
Few people know that 20 years earlier, in 1976, Kodak had invented the digital camera. It had the patents and the first-mover advantage.
But that first digital camera was a baby that only its inventor (Steven Sasson) could love and appreciate.
That first camera took .01 megapixel photos, took 23 seconds to record the image to a tape drive, and only shot in black and white.
When Sasson showed his discovery to his executives, they ignored the technology and its implications.
Fast forward to 2012, when Kodak filed for bankruptcy – disrupted by the very technology that they invented and subsequently ignored.
In that same year, another company in the digital imagery business, Instagram, was acquired by Facebook for $1 billion, but they had just 13 employees.
We've seen many other examples of disruption beyond Kodak.
Blockbuster, for example, was disrupted by Netflix, a company that dematerialized, demonetized and democratized the video industry.
The same year Blockbuster went bankrupt (2010), Netflix hit $2.2 billion in valuation.
Today, Netflix is valued at nearly $70 billion.
Regardless of their size, companies that don’t embrace exponential technological change will be left in the dust.
What industries will be disrupted next?
As an entrepreneur, how can you capitalize on disruptive opportunities to create new billion-dollar businesses?