Monday, July 7, 2025

On the Prowl On Our "Virtual Route 66" In America (Special Edition)

 


At about 10:30 this morning local time, heavily armed masked agents in trucks, armored vehicles, a helicopter, on foot, and on horseback, accompanied by a gun mounted on a truck raided the MacArthur Park area of Los Angeles. Journalist Mel Buer reported that agents from Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), the National Guard, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) brought what he called a “massive federal presence.”

Fox News Channel personnel were embedded with the raiders and broadcast throughout the operation, suggesting that it was designed for the media as a show of force to intimidate opponents. CBP brought its own press team, and its people were also taking photos of bystanders. After Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass arrived and spoke with Border Patrol Chief Gregory Bovino, the agents left. It is not clear that there was a specific target for the raid, or that anyone was arrested.

Later, Bovino told Bill Melugin of the Fox News Channel, “I don’t work for Karen Bass. Better get used to us now, cause this is going to be normal very soon. We will go anywhere, anytime we want in Los Angeles.”

Immigrants rights groups sued Bovino last week to block what they call an “ongoing pattern and practice of flouting the Constitution and federal law” during immigration raids.

Steve Beynon of Military dot com reports that about 70 National Guard troops have been deployed to the new detention facility in the Florida Everglades as the administration “leans harder on the military to enforce its nationwide immigration crackdown.” Unlike the National Guard troops Trump federalized in Los Angeles, these troops are operating as state troops under Florida governor Ron DeSantis. Another 8,500 active-duty and National Guard troops are stationed along the border between the U.S. and Mexico.

The Trump administration is also sending 200 Marines to Florida to aid ICE, part of a push to increase deportations by using active-duty troops.

The U.S. Marine Corps has launched a pilot program to station ICE agents at Camp Pendleton in California, Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia, and Marine Corps Base Hawaii. Sarah Rumpf-Whitten of Fox News writes that the plan is to strengthen security at those bases, although University of Tampa defense professor Abby Hall Blanco pointed out: "It gives kind of an odd impression that the Marine Corps is not handling its own security sufficiently. Having known quite a few Marines in my time, I can't imagine that they would find that to be a particularly flattering interpretation.”

As Harvard sociologist Theda Skocpol pointed out in Talking Points Memo, it appears that officials in the Trump administration are using immigration as a way to establish a police state. Indeed, they are using the concept that presidents have control of foreign affairs as a way to work around the laws in place to prevent a dictatorship.

In its 2024 Donald J. Trump v. United States decision, the Supreme Court majority held that a former president has “absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority,” as well as “presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts.” In April 2025 the court specified that it considered foreign affairs to fall within a president’s constitutional authority, writing in Noem v. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia that the executive branch was owed “deference…in the conduct of foreign affairs.”

Although the Framers of the Constitution put the power to make laws in the hands of Congress, they divided power in foreign affairs between Congress and the president. Almost immediately, presidents began to assert their authority over foreign affairs, noting that the Constitution gave them power to appoint ambassadors and negotiate treaties and pointing to the president’s role as commander-in-chief of the Army. The branches have tussled over this power ever since, but as James Goldgeiger and Elizabeth N. Saunders wrote in Foreign Affairs, presidential power over foreign affairs has grown dramatically since 2000.

After the attacks of September 11, 2001, members of Congress were unwilling to appear soft on terror and so allowed President George W. Bush great leeway in the nation’s “war on terror,” even after it became clear that Bush’s invasion of Iraq in 2003 was failing. In Foreign Affairs last month, Saunders wrote that a lack of accountability for either the failures of the Iraq War or the 2008 international financial crisis fed the idea that the president could make sweeping decisions about both foreign intervention and the international economy without check by Congress.

On February 12, 2025, the Trump administration made clear that its members intended to expand Trump’s power by pushing the boundaries of what foreign affairs entails. In an executive order, Trump claimed the Constitution “vests the power to conduct foreign policy in the President of the United States.”

Trump’s actual work in foreign affairs has been different from what he promised during his presidential campaign. His vow that he could end Russia’s war against Ukraine with one phone call has resulted only in Russian president Vladimir Putin’s accelerating his attacks on Ukraine. As foreign affairs journalist Anne Applebaum wrote on July 4 in The Atlantic, it is clear that Putin believes he can conquer all of Ukraine because Trump is abandoning the longstanding U.S. bipartisan support for Ukraine and pivoting the U.S. to back Russia.

Last week the administration said it would not send Ukraine a large shipment of weapons already funded under President Joe Biden. It claimed that U.S. stockpiles of weapons are insufficient, a claim former Biden officials and independent analysts contradict. Applebaum notes that Russia has interpreted the change as a sign that the U.S. is ending its support for Ukraine.

The U.S. is also essentially lifting the economic sanctions that have hamstrung Russia’s economy. By not adjusting sanctions to combat developing Russian workarounds, the administration is allowing Russia to rebuild its economy. In addition, the Trump administration has stopped countering Russian disinformation around the world, while Trump appointees, including Trump’s main negotiator with Russia, Steve Witkoff, regularly parrot Russian propaganda.

Trump’s launching of strikes against Iran’s nuclear weapon production sites without input from Congress earned pushback from congress members who noted that the president’s authority to launch emergency operations depends on an actual emergency. Trump’s own director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, told Congress in March that the Intelligence Community assessed Iran was not, in fact, building a nuclear weapon.

Then Trump’s claim he had “totally obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program turned out to be exaggerated, although as journalists questioned his statement, the administration doubled down on it. Today, Barak Ravid of Axios reported that Israeli officials believe Trump will green-light further Israeli attacks on Iran. Trump has said twice since the U.S. strikes that the U.S. could attack Iran again if Iran renews its nuclear program.

But the claim to domestic power based in the president’s alleged right to control over foreign affairs has fueled much of the administration's domestic agenda. The administration claimed the power to render undocumented Venezuelans to the notorious terrorist CECOT prison in El Salvador by arguing that the Venezuelan government was sending members of the MS-13 gang to invade the U.S. After wrongfully delivering Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador in violation of a court order, the administration claimed courts could not order him returned to the U.S. because that order would interfere with Trump’s ability to conduct foreign affairs.

Documents filed in court today said Salvadoran officials told the United Nations that the U.S. retained jurisdiction over the migrants it sent to El Salvador, undermining the administration’s insistence that it has no control over migrants once they are out of U.S. territory. El Salvador simply had an agreement with the U.S. to use the Salvadoran prison system to detain U.S. prisoners, they said. “In this context, the jurisdiction and legal responsibility for these persons lie exclusively with the competent foreign authorities, by virtue of international agreements signed and in accordance with the principles of sovereignty and international cooperation in criminal matters.”

In a lawsuit against the administration, Abrego Garcia says he was tortured in El Salvador, severely beaten, deprived of sleep, inadequately fed, denied bathroom facilities, and tortured psychologically. He says he lost 31 pounds in two weeks.

Today the administration ended temporary protection from deportation for about 72,000 migrants from Honduras and another 4,000 from Nicaragua. The decision strips them of their legal status and echoes similar decisions made about migrants from Afghanistan, Cameroon, Haiti, Nepal, and Venezuela. A federal court has blocked the early termination of protected status for Haitians.

Notes:

https://history.state.gov/departmenthistory/short-history/framework

https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript#2

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a949_lkhn.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/file/147551-0/dl

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/imperial-president-home-emperor-abroad

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/one-voice-for-americas-foreign-relations/

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/07/putin-trump-russia-ukraine/683414/

https://www.axios.com/2025/07/07/israel-strike-iran-nuclear-sites-again-trump

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/kilmar-abrego-garcia-suffered-psychological-physical-torture-el-salvad-rcna216685

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/macarthur-park-los-angeles-karen-bass-ice-raids-b2784313.html

Sarah Rumpf-Whitten, Marines team up with ICE in bold move to boost ‘threat awareness’ at critical military bases, Fox News, July 7, 2025.

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2025/07/03/guardsmen-help-operate-alligator-alcatraz-trump-increasingly-leans-military-immigration-crackdown.html

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/200-marines-florida-ice/story?id=123466361

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/critical-read-about-the-bbb-federalism-and-the-future-of-american-democracy

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/07/trump-tps-honduras-nicaragua

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-07-07/immigration-agents-descend-on-macarthur-park

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/americas-spies-say-iran-wasnt-building-a-nuclear-weapon-trump-dismisses-that-assessment

X:

BillMelugin_/status/1942280433221484912

MayorOfLA/status/1942296116378362055

BillMelugin_/status/1942313482323648820

Bluesky:

juliadavisnews.bsky.social/post/3ltb4bstl6s2u

melbuer.bsky.social/post/3ltfefld43c2b

djrothkopf.bsky.social/post/3ltfmqahric2t

reichlinmelnick.bsky.social/post/3ltfnlnure22k

craigcalcaterra.bsky.social/post/3ltfghgcfy226

Monday, June 30, 2025

#OutsiderVibes (Special Quarter-End Edition): YouTube Movies Presents The Darkest Hour, The King's Speech. We Were Soliders & GI Jane

 


Our team is privileged to present The Darkest Hour & The King's Speech courtesy of the team at YouTube Movies.   Our team will be dark on our Digital Properties through the July 4 Weekend here in the United States, although our analysis over our Social Grid Corner on Instagram (Outsiders' Weekly on Instagram, The Daily Outsider on Facebook & X) as we look forward to the continued privilege to serve: 


Tuesday, June 24, 2025

On Our "Virtual Route 66" (Special Edition): Discourse on the Iran-Israel War & The Role of the United States




Our team pulled together this special edition of our "Virtual Route 66" in the aftermath of the US Strike on Iran  (and as we finished this edition, the ceasfire was still in effect, with thoughts courtesy the Coop Scoop, Heather Cox Richardson, Mana Neystani, Kaltoons, Dr. Abbas Milani of Stanford University, Seth Meyers, Stephen Colbert and POD Save America: 

21 Facts About the War Against Iran

And many many more to still be revealed in the days to come

 

 

(if you read an earlier version of this on my facebook page, this version is updated with new info.)

June 23 2025

By Marc Cooper

1. Iran agreed to halt forward movement on nuclear weapons development in negotiations with Obama more than a decade ago.

2. Iran agreed to limit uranium enrichment to 5%-- well below weaponization grade.

3. In 2018 and for no rational reason, Trump voided the agreement. Uranium enrichment immediately escalated to 60%, very close to bomb grade.

4. Netanyahu has been using Iran as a political foil for 20 yrs and unsuccessfully tried to kill the original deal made with Obama. He made his move now because he is bereft of any answers for Gaza and knew that Iran was weak and that a stuoid and vainglorious Trump was also in need of desperate distraction from his sinking poll numbers as well as a cheap ego boost.

5. Israel's unprovoked unilateral attack on Iran came while Iran was in the middle of restarted talks between Iran and the US. Netanyahu’s goal has little to do with uranium enrichment. It had everything to do with sinking the current talks and making sure there could be no deal with Iran.

6. The last thing that Netanyahu wants is a contained non-nuclear Iran as it would rob him of his needed political enemy. He would risk losing power and going to jail for corruption.

7. Netanyahu needs a "nuclear Iran" the same way the Cuban regime needs the US embargo. Take them away and the raison d'etre of both regimes collapses. Imagine Trump’s dilemma if all immigrants magically disappeared. He’d have nothing to mumble about.

8. The Iranian leadership could easily anticipate an attack on Fodom and it is most likely they had already moved their uranium stockpile elsewhere. And the stockpile is the key component to nuclear development. The Times of Israel is now reporting the Iranians evacuated the three targeted sites some days ago. Maybe yes, maybe no. But claiming they did is good for Bibi as it gibes him the predicate to continue pounding Iran,

9. Either way there is no way to know how much damage was wrought. Trump's declarations of complete obliteration is the translation of Mission Accomplished. One note: The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan “Raisin'“ Caine immediately undercut the Trump/Hegseth line about total oblitertion, telling reporters that while an initial assessment indicated “severe damage and destruction,” it would take time for the final battle damage to be known.

10. Statements by JD Vance that we are not at war with Iran but only with its nuclear program are taken from a late nite show monologue of stupid jokes. Better ask the Iranians first and wait till most Americans can find Iran on the map. Iran is certainly at war now with us and our allies. When they close the Strait of Hormuz as they now threaten and cut off 20% of the world oil supply, you can count on gas prices skyrocketing and industry sucking air. At least until Trump blows a hole in the blockage in a tit for tat conflagration.

11. Trump did NOT want a prolonged war with Iran. But he was played like a violin by Netanyahu. Not able to "finish" the job, Bibi bet that Trump's ego and his stupidity would lead him to see an opportunity to be a hero at little cost and his delusional desire to get a Nobel Peace Prize would lure him into this quagmire. He was right.

12. The call for peace now made by Trump is absurd. The Iranians have already responded with a successful missile attack last night on Israel creating a lot of damage. And some 40 Iranians drones have penetrated Israeli air space as of Sunday night. Next up: US military bases within short range of Iran's arsenal of short range ballistic missiles. Sitting ducks. And the door to full scale war by the U.S. in response.

13. Iran is a sophisticated nation of 90 million people with a third of the population as militant Islamic supporters of the Mullahs. Any ground incursion into Iran will be a wholesale meat grinder.

14. If a lucky bomb hits right or an Israeli or American commando team or popular chaos in Iran takes out the Supreme Leader and causes regime change, the likely successor will be the economically rich military led by the Revolutionary Guard and the regime will be more radical.

15. Nobody's home in the National Security apparatus of the US to offer any rational counsel. Trump and Hegseth are dumb and dumber and the other sycophants don't even register on any IQ scale. The talk about bi-partisan” congressional disapproval is horse puckey. Only 3 or 4 of the usual and marginalized GOP electeds have outright condemned the intervention (Gaetz, Massie, Rand and MTG). Meaningless. Another 4 or 5 Trumpanzees have “expressed concern” but they are not going to go any farther. And the Democrats clutched their pearls in the public run up to the attack.

16. The consequences of this supposedly one and done will kick off bloody and perilous outcomes for many years to come with possibly catastrophic events. This is the beginning, not the end.

17. The bombing is one more giant step toward the death of democratic rule in the U.S. We are governed by a pathological authoritarian man-baby who unconstitutionally ignored congressional approval and will face no consequences except for some wet noodle press releases from some Democrats.

18. And while big American cities have gone on high alert fearing domestic terror attacks, Trump Appoints A 22-Year-Old Ex-Gardener and Grocery Store Assistant to Lead U.S. Terror PreventionFeel any safer?

19.Israel is now a rogue state immune to international law and basic decency led by yet another unbalanced authoritarian who clearly places zero value on the lives of Arabs or Iranians. He is today the single greatest threat to Israel’s long-term security. The U.S. is following suit down Bibi’s path to the abyss.

20.This extremely dangerous escalation in a second regional war comes as Netanyahu still lacks any rational plan as to what to do with two million Gazans he has made homeless in the first one. And in the last few weeks, as many as 400 Gaza Palestinians have been gunned down by the IDF as they scrambled for scarce food aid,—provided by Israel. Go figure that one out.The population of Iran is 50 times greater than Gaza. There are no plans. Just bullets and bombs and bullshit.

21.While I am a fierce critic of Netanyahu and company I fully support Israel’s right to exist and to protect itself. Just as I support the Palestinian right to self determination and self-defense. I oppose terror and random killing from both sides and their respective allies. As to Iran, I hold nothing but contempt for its violent religious dictatorship and hope one day its people will achieve full liberation. Since my teens I have opposed theocratic regimes, like Iran and Israel. ++

In a timeline of Trump’s decision to drop 12 of the reportedly 20 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs the U.S. military possessed on Iran, New York Times reporters confirmed what Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo judged from the beginning: Trump wanted in on the optics of what seemed to be Israel’s successful strikes against Iran.

Andrew Perez and Asawin Suebsaeng of Rolling Stone reported conversations with administration officials who confirmed there was no new intelligence to suggest Iran was on the brink of producing nuclear weapons.

Mark Mazzetti, Jonathan Swan, Maggie Haberman, Eric Schmitt, and Helene Cooper reported yesterday in the New York Times that Trump had warned Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu against striking Iran but changed his mind after seeing how Israel’s military action was “playing” on television. The reporters write: “The president was closely monitoring Fox News, which was airing wall-to-wall praise of Israel’s military operation and featuring guests urging Mr. Trump to get more involved.”

Trump began to hint he had been part of the operation, and military advisors began to draw up plans for a strike. According to the reporters, by June 17—three days after his military parade had fizzled and more than 5 million Americans had turned out to protest his administration—Trump had decided to bomb Iran.

Rather than keeping the mission quiet, Trump issued increasingly aggressive social media posts appearing to hint at a strike. David E. Sanger of the New York Times cited reports from Israeli intelligence saying that Iranian officials had removed 400 kilograms (about 880 pounds) of enriched uranium from the Fordo enrichment plant to another nuclear complex, although at least some equipment and records would likely have remained there.

Republicans have talked about bombing Iran to stop its nuclear aspirations since the early 2000s, but the relationship between the U.S. and Iran relating to nuclear technology actually reaches back to 1953. In that year, under President Dwight D. Eisenhower, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the United Kingdom supported a coup against the elected Iranian prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh, after he called for the nationalization of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, in which British interests controlled a majority stake.

In his place, the former leader of the country, Mohammad Reza Shah, retook power. In 1954, Iran accepted a 25-year agreement that gave western oil companies 50% ownership of Iran’s oil production.

At the same time, President Eisenhower proposed trying to defang international fears of nuclear war by shifting nuclear technologies toward civilian uses, including energy. On December 8, 1953, he spoke before the General Assembly of the United Nations in New York City on how atomic energy could be used for peaceful ends. The initiative, known as “Atoms for Peace,”

provided reactors, nuclear fuel, and training for scientists for countries that promised they would use the technology only for peaceful civilian purposes.

In 1967 the U.S. supplied a nuclear reactor and highly enriched uranium to Iran, and trained Iranian scientists in the United States. In 1974, according to Ariana Rowberry of the Brookings Institution, the shah announced he intended to build 20 new reactors in the next 20 years.

Then, in 1979, the Islamic revolution in Iran forced out the shah and put Islamic leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in power. In 1980, after the U.S. admitted the shah into the country for cancer treatments, Iranian students stormed the U.S. embassy, taking 52 Americans hostage for 444 days. The U.S. cut diplomatic ties with Iran, imposed sanctions, froze Iranian assets in the U.S., and ended the civilian nuclear cooperation agreement with Iran.

Iran turned to Pakistan, China, and Russia to expand its nuclear program. Tensions between the U.S. and Iran increased until Republican politicians talked about bombing the sites of Iran’s nuclear program. Famously, Arizona senator John McCain joked about bombing Iran in 2007 when he was running for the Republican presidential nomination, singing “Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran” to the tune of the Beach Boys’ classic song “Barbara Ann.”

McCain lost the 2008 election to Democratic president Barack Obama, and in 2013 at the beginning of his second term, Obama began high-level talks to cap Iran’s enrichment of uranium that could be used for weapons. In 2015, forty-seven Republican senators, led by then freshman senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas, tried to blow up the talks, sending an open letter to Iranian officials to put them on notice that “the next president could revoke such an executive agreement with the stroke of a pen and future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time.”

This was an astonishing breach of the longstanding U.S. tradition of presenting a united front in foreign negotiations. Nonetheless, in 2015 the U.S., Iran, China, Russia, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the European Union signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) that limited Iran’s enriched uranium in exchange for the lifting of sanctions.

At about the same time, negotiators settled an unrelated case between the U.S. and Iran at The Hague, involving the return of American prisoners to the U.S. and Iranian assets frozen in the U.S. to Iran. Since Iran was cut off from international finance systems at the time, the U.S. returned some of those assets in 2016 as Swiss francs, euros, and other currencies. Donald Trump, who was then running for the presidency, insisted that the Obama administration had sent “pallets of cash” to Iran as part of a deal to free the prisoners. “Iran was in big trouble, they had sanctions, they were dying, we took off the sanctions and made this horrible deal and now they’re a power,” Trump told reporters.

Then, in 2016, voters put Trump in the White House. Although the nuclear deal appeared to be working, Trump left it in 2018, calling it a “horrible one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made.” Without the U.S. the agreement broke down. Iran resumed its program for enriching uranium.

A week and a half ago, on June 12, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched strikes against Iran, and on June 21, Trump ordered strikes on three of Iran’s nuclear sites, claiming that after 40 years of Iranian hostility, “Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.”

In fact, the effect of the strikes is not at all clear, although Trump insisted yet again this afternoon that “[o]bliteration is an accurate term!... Bullseye!!!”

Trump’s strikes on Iran underscore how Republican leaders see governance. They seemed to see the careful negotiations under Obama and the international inspections that certified Iran’s adherence to the JCPOA as signs of weakness, preferring simply to use American military might to impose U.S. will. Trump has combined that dominance ideology with his enthusiasm for performances that play well on television.

This afternoon, Iran responded to the U.S. strikes with its own missile attack on a U.S. military base in Qatar, after warning of the upcoming attack to enable Qatar to intercept the missiles.

Trump posted on social media: “Iran has officially responded to our Obliteration of their Nuclear Facilities with a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered. There have been 14 missiles fired—13 were knocked down, and 1 was ‘set free,’ because it was headed in a nonthreatening direction. I am pleased to report that NO Americans were harmed, and hardly any damage was done. Most importantly, they’ve gotten it all out of their ‘system,’ and there will, hopefully, be no further HATE. I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice, which made it possible for no lives to be lost, and nobody to be injured. Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region, and I will enthusiastically encourage Israel to do the same. Thank you for your attention to this matter! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”

Ten minutes later, he posted: “CONGRATULATIONS WORLD, IT’S TIME FOR PEACE!”

Republican dominance politics began in the 1950s as a way to prevent the federal government from protecting Black and Brown civil rights. Since then, it has reinforced the idea of asserting power through violence. And it has always reinforced the power of white men over women and racial and gender minorities.

Today the U.S. Supreme Court granted the Trump administration's request to allow it to deport migrants to places other than their country of origin, often to countries plagued by violence. The administration has claimed this power as part of its campaign to scare immigrants from coming to the U.S. by demonstrating that they could end up in a third country with no recourse. The court majority did not explain its reasoning; the three liberal justices—Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor—dissented sharply.

“In…earlier rulings, the court cleared the way for the government to treat as many as a million migrants as removable who previously weren’t,” legal analyst Steve Vladeck told Angélica Franganilla Díaz and John Fritze of CNN. “And today’s ruling allows the government to remove those individuals and others to any country that will take them—without providing any additional process beyond an initial removal hearing, and without regard to the treatment they may face in those countries.”