| Aamna Mohdin |  |
| | | Good morning. Welcome back to the Cotton Capital newsletter. Did you miss us? A lot has happened since I wrote my last Cotton Capital newsletter in the summer of 2023. Reparations, once treated by many western governments as a fringe demand, have now moved steadily towards the centre of global politics. Over the coming months, Cotton Capital will take you through the people, institutions and political movements reshaping debates around enslavement, colonialism and repair, and the growing global pressure forcing former imperial powers to confront histories they have long preferred to keep buried.
A deeply divided world In March, the United Nations voted to describe transatlantic trafficking as the “gravest crime against humanity” and called reparations “a concrete step towards remedying historical wrongs”. The vote marked a huge symbolic victory for campaigners and further galvanised a movement that shows little sign of slowing down. The resolution had been proposed by the president of Ghana, John Dramani Mahama (pictured top), who said: “Let it be recorded that when history beckoned, we did what was right for the memory of millions who suffered the indignity of slavery.” The vote also revealed a world deeply divided on the question of reparatory justice. At least 123 states, including much of Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, Latin America and the Arab world, backed the resolution. But the western bloc, including Australia, Canada, the UK and EU member states, abstained, while Argentina, Israel and the US voted against it. | |  Beating around the bush … Keir Starmer in Samoa in 2024. Photograph: William West/AP | For many African and Caribbean nations, the vote was seen as another step in a long international campaign for acknowledgment, apology and repair. But western resistance has remained firm. During debates at the UN, several countries argued that because the transatlantic slave trade was not formally illegal under international law at the time it took place, there was no legal basis for compensation today. But, as critics have long argued, such reasoning reduces one of the largest crimes in human history to a technicality. The UN vote reminded me of Keir Starmer’s ill-fated trip to Samoa in 2024. Starmer was the first sitting British prime minister to visit a Pacific island nation, hoping to strengthen Commonwealth ties and project a renewed global Britain. Instead, the trip became dominated by calls for justice over slavery and colonialism. Starmer’s blunt insistence that reparations were “not on the agenda” went down like a lead balloon, while the silence of the then-foreign secretary David Lammy, who had previously spoken openly about the legacies of slavery as a backbencher, on the matter echoed loudly. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, has said reparations for his country’s role in the enslavement of African people is an issue that should be addressed, though stopped short of making clear proposals. Meanwhile, Nigel Farage’s Reform UK, currently leading in several opinion polls, has taken a more confrontational approach, announcing it would deny visas to people from countries seeking slavery reparations from Britain.
Reshaping the debate | |  Major shifts … Chris Osuh (left), the Guardian’s community affairs correspondent based in Manchester. Photograph: Ruby Ramelize | There have also been major shifts within the Guardian. In 2023, the Scott Trust launched its Legacies of Enslavement programme, including the Cotton Capital series, and apologised after acknowledging that the founder of the Manchester Guardian and his financial backers profited from the enslavement of African people in Jamaica and the US south. Three years on, the Scott Trust says it has made “significant progress”, including hundreds of community engagement meetings, expanded coverage of the global Black diaspora, and initiatives aimed at improving diversity within journalism. We have also hired eight new correspondents across the Black diaspora. Ebony Riddell Bamber, the programme director, reflects on the experience of asking people what repair might look like here. “We have learned that repair means economic justice, through retention of property and land, or access to education,” she writes. “It means preserving and uplifting our culture and history; it means responding to the links between climate and environmental devastation and enslavement; it means being in community with one another, locally and globally.” Over the coming months, Cotton Capital will explore the political battles, historical reckonings and moral questions reshaping debates around slavery, colonialism and reparatory justice. For now, I leave you with a question that has lingered since my last newsletter: as demands for reparations grow louder across the global south, how long can western powers continue to insist the issue belongs to the past? |
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment